Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +1547%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
2048
Shading Units
16896
128
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GB100
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
208 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.3
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy