Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +185%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Vega 10
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy