Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 290W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X +49%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
290W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy