Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2 +515%
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro Server
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1792
Shading Units
216
112
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

265W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GT200
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy