Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9010 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

AMD FirePro S9010 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S9010 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9010 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9010 +56%
2.867 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy