Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +378%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
219W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy