Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +418%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
236W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy