Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +2596%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
2816
Shading Units
72
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT215
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy