Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +106%
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2016
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1125 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1024
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Baffin
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy