Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +23%
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2048
176
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
375W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tahiti
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy