Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs Intel Arc A310

AMD FirePro S9170 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +94%
5.238 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-128
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy