Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD FirePro S9170
VS
ATI FirePro V3800
AMD FirePro S9170
ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2416 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +907%
5.238 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
400
176
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Redwood
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy