Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +313%
5.238 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Aug 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy