Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +18%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU116
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy