Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +9%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2304
176
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy