Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +224%
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
85W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tobago
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy