Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 20GB)
Lower TDP (275W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +1131%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
320bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
5376
176
TMUs
336
64
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 31
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy