Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +39%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
44
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Vesuvius
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy