Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +1715%
7.987 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR4
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
R600
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy