Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +147%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Tahiti
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy