AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
+159%
7.987 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
25W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
DG2-128
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.6
