Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (205W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700 +8%
8.663 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
205W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 10
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy