Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 +510%
48.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6X
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
4096
Shading Units
9728
256
TMUs
304
64
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
320W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
AD103
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy