Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (190W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +300%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3072
256
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
190W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 32
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy