Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA T600

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +367%
7.987 TFLOPS
T600
1.709 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
40W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
TU117
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy