ATI FirePro V3700 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
6104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XTX
+126618%
81.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3300 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
6144
4
TMUs
384
4
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
633.6 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1267 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
162.2 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
355W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 31
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX+
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
