Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3700 vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

ATI FirePro V3700 vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT +31009%
19.91 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 48
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net