Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3750 vs AMD FireStream 9250

ATI FirePro V3750 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +184%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
10
320
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
RV770
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

48W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy