Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (31W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +1385%
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
400
Shading Units
16
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GT216
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy