Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 11 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +1081%
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
400
Shading Units
16
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GT218S
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy