Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 768MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GS OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (768GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +333%
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GS OEM
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jul 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
768MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
400
Shading Units
48
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
G94
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy