Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +176%
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
400
Shading Units
72
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GT215
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy