Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1392MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +311%
2.138 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1392 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
400
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.54 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.41 GFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.138 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GP107
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP107-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy