Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +420%
0.52 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
400
Shading Units
48
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GF119
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy