Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +400%
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2011
FirePro
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
80
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Cedar
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy