Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7350X2 +1001%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1188 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
2304
20
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy