Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +20%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
480
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Turks
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy