Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM +55%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Oland
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy