Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +12305%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
5376
20
TMUs
336
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 31
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy