Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
-
400
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV560
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy