Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V420

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V420

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 32GB VRAM AMD Radeon Pro V420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V420 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (819.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon Pro V420 +2132%
13.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
819.2GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
435.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.85 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.93 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.963 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Vega 20
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS (215-0914026)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy