Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +771%
5.437 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Feb 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
480
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.96 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
169.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.87 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.437 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
169.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
TU116
Turks GL
GPU Variant
TU116-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy