Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD FirePro W4300

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +128%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Dec 2015
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Bonaire
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy