Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FireMV 2250

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV516
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy