Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.68GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4850 X2 +60%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
995 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
63.68GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
R700
Turks GL
GPU Variant
R700 PRO (215-0669065)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy