Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
400 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +680%
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
May 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
M93
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy