Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro V7800

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800 +223%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1440
24
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Cypress
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy