Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI +197%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
20
480
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Cayman
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy