Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 +198%
1.862 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Oct 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
480
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.10 GFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.862 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
58.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GP107
Turks GL
GPU Variant
GP107-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy