Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +30%
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
480
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT200
Turks GL
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy